A good Logico-Linguistic Inquiry Towards Foundations off Physics: Region I

Still, it remains available to how viewer means so it performs, which is the substance of condition

Scientific data, try steps, abilities and you will interpretations is invented from the attention, as well as creativity and you may term and you may layout programming. Ideal reporting out-of abilities is additionally critical. Particularly in theoretic physics, linguistic skill and you will carefulness while you are composing are becoming a pressing you prefer during the the new sufferers during the perspectives out of established training. There are people from almost every other fields who’re ready to misunderstand and spark a lot of discourses/conclusions; it generate courses off several bytes of information like “yes/no/maybe”; for that reason, nonscience or occult misinformation is offered, samples of and this are plentiful in the sphere off special relativity principle and you can quantum physics. Hence, technology cannot use the phrases one to supported the fresh Paleolithic head. Category: General Research and you will Thinking

Trappist-step one Celebrity System

The newest James Webb Place Telescope (JWST) will quickly transcend what the Hubble has been capable speak about. Certainly the earliest purpose will likely be the latest TRAPPIST-1 celebrity system for the Aquarius. This article examines why you to definitely puny red dwarf is so interesting, and why the brand new search for alien existence forms e. Category: General Research and you may Beliefs

Physical dimensions like “mass”, “length”, “charge”, represented by the symbols $[M], [L], [Q]$, are <\it>, but used as <\it>to perform dimensional analysis in particular, and to write the equations of physics in general, by the physicist. The law of excluded middle falls short of explaining the contradictory meanings of the same symbols. The statements like “$m\to 0$”, “$r\to 0$”, “$q\to 0$”, used by the physicist, are inconsistent on dimensional grounds because “$ m$”, “$r$”, “$q$” represent <\it>with physical dimensions of $[M], [L], [Q]$ respectively and “$0$” represents just a number — devoid of physical dimension. Consequently, the involvement of the statement “$\lim_$, where $q$ is the test charge” in the definition of electric field, leads to either circular reasoning or a Political Sites dating review contradiction regarding the experimental verification of the smallest charge in the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. Considering such issues as problematic, by choice, I make an inquiry regarding the basic language in terms of which physics is written, with an aim of exploring how truthfully the verbal statements can be converted to the corresponding physico-mathematical expressions, where “physico-mathematical” signifies the involvement of physical dimensions. Such investigation necessitates an explanation by demonstration of “self inquiry”, “middle way”, “dependent origination”, “emptiness/relational existence”, which are certain terms that signify the basic tenets of Buddhism. In light of such demonstration I explain my view of “definition”; the relations among quantity, physical dimension and number; meaninglessness of “zero quantity” and the associated logico-linguistic fallacy; difference between unit and unity. Considering the importance of the notion of electric field in physics, I present a critical analysis of the definitions of electric field due to Maxwell and Jackson, along with the physico-mathematical conversions of the verbal statements. The analysis of Jackson’s definition points towards an expression of the electric field as an infinite series due to the associated “limiting process” of the test charge. However, it brings out the necessity of a postulate regarding the existence of charges, which nevertheless follows from the definition of quantity. Consequently, I explain the notion of <\it>that act as the middle way to resolve the contradiction regarding the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. In passing, I provide a logico-linguistic analysis, in physico-mathematical terms, of two verbal statements of Maxwell in relation to his definition of electric field, which suggests Maxwell’s conception of dependent origination of distance and charge (i.e. $[L]\equiv[Q]$) and that of emptiness in the context of relative vacuum (in contrast to modern absolute vacuum). This work is an appeal for the dissociation of the categorical disciplines of logic and physics and on the large, a fruitful merger of Eastern philosophy and Western science. Category: General Science and Philosophy